Search for: "People v Word"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 17,906
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm
Yesterday the University at Buffalo Law School held the panel discussion “Sex, Solicitation, and the Supreme Court: Remembering People v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:48 pm
In People v Cass (#28 decided 2/16/12) the defendant's claim of extreme emotional disturbance was undercut by the fact that he'd allegedly committed a nearly identical murder 14 months earlier. [read post]
Will the Real Evidence-Based Ebola Policy Please Stand Up? Seven Takeaways From Maine DHHS v. Hickox
6 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
The case I mentioned in my last post, Maine Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 7:22 pm
Other people are involved. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 5:13 pm
Rosencrants, 89 Misc.2d 721, 392 N.Y.S.2d 808; People v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:43 am
The test is not how many people in fact accessed the photograph but how many relevant persons might have. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
Yesterday, thirteen judges of the Fourth Circuit sitting en banc heard argument in IRAP v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 10:04 am
(Hell, this post is Part V in a series with that title.) [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 12:05 am
In my post from Monday, I neglected to mention that in addition to Landry v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 11:21 am
Maybe at the high end of the lip balm industry people are fine with 25%, or 50%, or 99% (or whatever) wasting away in the tube. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 12:24 pm
Applies the words that are employed by the statute in a straightforward fashion. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 4:35 pm
Compare Kanter v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:26 am
The court basically tells the EO drafters to EAT THEIR OWN WORDS. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 4:44 am
In Grutter v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 2:34 pm
By Eric Goldman Finkel v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 12:27 pm
Division 1 of this court reversed the conviction in People v. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 6:23 pm
Her retaliation claim failed for lack of evidence that her termination for excessive absences was pretextual (Lounds v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:32 pm
In other words, where the state police guidelines impose a two-hour limit on the duration of any roadblock unless the troop commander ordered otherwise, and where the supervisor on the scene without the troop commander's authorization extended the duration of the roadblock by 30 minutes, the evidence was held to be lawfully suppressed. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:44 pm
Justice Edelmann, in West Vancouver (District), v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 3:26 am
Like the others (Rai v Bholowasia, Asghar & Anor v Ahmad & Ors, Ma v St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust) this was not a case against the mainstream media. [read post]
