Search for: "Person v. Person"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 123,275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2011, 2:48 am
Astellas Pharma Ltd and others v Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty and others [2011] EWCA Civ 752; [2011] WLR (D) 213 “An injunction obtained in representative proceedings was binding on all persons represented in the claim, but a judge was entitled, in the exercise of his discretion, to refuse to frame the order in terms which would make it enforceable by or against persons who were not parties to the claim. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:50 am
Frisdranken Industrie Winters BV v Red Bull GmbH (Case C-119/10); [2012] WLR (D) 20 “A service provider who, under an order from and on the instructions of another person, filled packaging which was supplied to it by the other person who, in advance, affixed to it a sign which was identical with, or similar to, a sign protected as a trade mark did not itself make use of the sign that was liable to be prohibited under that provision.” WLR Daily, 15th December… [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:03 am
., v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 4:50 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Bond v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:23 am
Law Society v McPhail [2011] WLR (D) 45 “In the interests of fairness, a person charged with contempt of court whose liberty was therefore at stake should be able to appear at a hearing to answer points raised by his accusers. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 9:12 am
In the human rights litigation over Argentina's "dirty war" of the 1970s and 1980s, a dispute over personal jurisdiction has reached the Supreme Court and will be argued on October 15 (DaimlerChysler AG v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:12 am
Regina v Tilley Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “If a third party knew of a change that affected the benefit of a person claiming income support, he would be guilty of an offence only if he dishonestly allowed the beneficiary to fail to report the change provided that he had been active in some way in the [...] [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:36 am
Regina v Cockburn Court of Appeal, Criminal Division “An anti-intruder device driven by gravity and triggered by pressure on a wire was capable of amounting to an engine calculated to inflict grievous bodily harm, under the Offences against the Person Act 1861. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 1:56 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 08-0083, 2009 MT 247, PATSY ANN TUCKER, Personal Representative of the Estate of CATHRYN CLAIRE ROSE TUCKER, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 2:13 pm
I've been working on a summary of FCC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:31 pm
McIntyre Machinery v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:29 am
The United States Supreme Court just decided FCC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:10 am
McIntyre Machinery v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
These are the issues on review in Meyer: (1) Has a person suffered "damage"... [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 9:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 10:43 am
Judge Abrams wrote that this “argument is unpersuasive because it conflicts with the Second Circuit’s holding in Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 4:42 pm
In a poorly decided opinion, Van Horn v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 11:01 am
Personalized User Model LLP v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:03 am
Austin v Southwark London Borough Council [2010] UKSC 28; [2010] WLR (D) 156 “The right of a ‘tolerated trespasser’, a person continuing to occupy his rented home following a breach of the terms of a conditional suspended possession order, to apply to the court for postponement of the date for possession to enable him to remedy the default and revive the secure tenancy, under s 85(2) of the Housing Act 1985, survived his death and could, consequently, be exercised… [read post]
