Search for: "Quality Products, Inc."
Results 1821 - 1840
of 4,400
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2016, 9:05 pm
As part of the plea agreement, Quality Egg paid a $6.8 million fine and the DeCosters $100,000 each, for a total of $7 million. [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:46 pm
The products recalled were 10 oz. [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:46 pm
The products recalled were 10 oz. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:15 am
[However, the survey participants were shown "high quality photographs" of the parties' products. [read post]
1 May 2016, 12:08 am
Jack Wills argued that it was entitled to all of these, but HoF claimed that the garments themselves had value over and above the value of the pigeon logo that had been found to infringe, i.e. there was value in the design, fit, quality and other intangible qualities of the garments and value in the store environment itself. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
Tropicana Products Inc., No. 09-cv-6130 (C.D. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am
First Quality Baby Products, LLC 15-927Issue: Whether and to what extent the defense of laches may bar a claim for patent infringement brought within the Patent Act’s six-year statutory limitations period, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 10:00 pm
Dole Fresh Vegetables Inc. finally suspended production at its salad plant in Springfield, OH, on Jan. 21 this year after a random test by state officials showed a bagged salad contained Listeria monocytogenes. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 5:00 pm
Stormans, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:01 am
Employer and other group health plan sponsors, fiduciaries and administrators and individual and group health insurers should confirm their plan documents and practices comply with new additional guidance on when the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) preventive care mandates set forth in Public Health Services (PHS) Act section 2713, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the Internal Revenue Code (the Code) require non-grandfathered group health plans to cover… [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:01 am
Employer and other group health plan sponsors, fiduciaries and administrators and individual and group health insurers should confirm their plan documents and practices comply with new additional guidance on when the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) preventive care mandates set forth in Public Health Services (PHS) Act section 2713, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the Internal Revenue Code (the Code) require non-grandfathered group health plans to cover… [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 10:55 am
In Quality Bicycle Products, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 10:55 am
In Quality Bicycle Products, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:51 pm
Ethicon, Inc., ___ F. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 10:07 am
Health Plans, Sponsors & Business Associates Should Verify Plan’s HIPAA Compliance Employers and other health plan sponsors and the health plan fiduciaries and business associates providing services involving dealings on behalf of the plan with protected health information just received another reminder to confirm and be prepared to prove all required business associate agreements are in place and that the health plans otherwise properly are administering all policies, practices,… [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 10:07 am
Health Plans, Sponsors & Business Associates Should Verify Plan’s HIPAA Compliance Employers and other health plan sponsors and the health plan fiduciaries and business associates providing services involving dealings on behalf of the plan with protected health information just received another reminder to confirm and be prepared to prove all required business associate agreements are in place and that the health plans otherwise properly are administering all policies, practices,… [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:35 pm
Since that date, the Respondent claimed it periodically marketed the products, but there were no further sales. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:35 pm
Since that date, the Respondent claimed it periodically marketed the products, but there were no further sales. [read post]
