Search for: "Rank v. State" Results 1821 - 1840 of 3,326
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Pfizer Inc., 867 N.Y.S.2d 425 (N.Y.A.D. 2008) (state appellate holding that plaintiff's home state controls on choice of law; similar to, but much better than, Desiano); (15) Vanderwerf v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:51 am by William Ford
The subcommittee staff’s analysis of the constitutionality of remote voting and participation focused heavily on whether a proposed change to the Senate’s rules, or the adoption of a new rule, would comply with the three-part test the Supreme Court established in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am by Diane Tweedlie
Where the applicant states that it wishes to have an appealable decision or where it wishes to maintain a higher-ranking request, as an exception, the application may also be directly refused. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am by Diane Tweedlie
Where the applicant states that it wishes to have an appealable decision or where it wishes to maintain a higher-ranking request, as an exception, the application may also be directly refused. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Good morning, Chairman McHenry, Ranking Member Waters, and members of the Committee. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
Criminal Law: Language RightsR. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
[b]ut the amendments will be the act of the State Governments” (p. 232). [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 10:15 am by Gritsforbreakfast
That bad, judge-created exception to the Fourth Amendment from the 1970s (Smith v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 8:36 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Organized Village of Kake v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 8:02 am by Lawfare Staff
Among other things, the bipartisan resolution—which was introduced by Senate Foreign Relations Committee Ranking Member Ben Cardin—reiterates a commitment to freedom of navigation and overflight for all parties, support for an ASEAN Code of Conduct, and a desire for the development of a “common approach” to reaffirm the upcoming decision Philippines v. [read post]