Search for: "STAND et al. v. STATE."
Results 1821 - 1840
of 2,184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2014, 10:50 am
Despite “the difficulty & awkwardness of operating by force on the collective will of a State,” armed federal intervention in state affairs must be permitted.[4]During the Convention, on three different occasions, Madison tried to grant the federal government this absolute “negative” (what we now call a veto) over all state legislation. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
The right to the COVID-19 vaccine stems from the harms that youth stand to face if they cannot access the COVID-19 vaccine due to parental refusal. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:02 am
Like the J.B. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 4:55 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California on June 15, 2009 (CBD, et al. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:45 am
Varsity Brands, Inc, et al. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:55 pm
The Kraft Heinz Co. et al. in the U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
BP PLC et al., further separating climate litigation cases from the federal court system by holding that the nuisance claims in climate litigation shall be heard in state courts and not federal. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 5:48 am
Parkinson, Jr., et al., No. 12-3342. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 12:40 pm
Lofgren, as Trustee, etc., et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2018) ___ Cal.App.5th ____. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 1:04 am
Ultimax Cement et al v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
(IPEG) Denmark Revamp of Danish PTO English language site – invitation for help from users (Class 46) Europe ECJ gives Copad ruling on exhaustion and luxury goods; interpretation of Article 8(2) leads to new questions: Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel, as liquidator of Société industrielle lingerie (Class 46) (IPKat) Anti-patent rally; criticism of practice of patenting biological processes - Munich (Intellectual… [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 10:35 am
Commissioner of Educ, et al. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:44 pm
Francis Hospital et al., 2011 WL 664753 (Tenn. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm
Jaswinder Chohan, et al., __ S.W.3d ___, No. 21-0017, 2023 WL 4035886 (Tex. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
Frye [9] and Lafler v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 2:23 pm
Hennessey, et al. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
In his opinion for 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, last November, upholding the constitutionality of state non-recognition of same-sex marriage and provoking the Supreme Court to take up the issue, Judge Jeffrey Sutton asserted that, “If it is constitutionally irrational to stand by the man-woman definition of marriage, it must be constitutionally irrational to stand by the monogamous definition of marriage. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:05 am
South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 12:57 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 2:28 am
’ The case U.S. v. [read post]
