Search for: "STAND et al. v. STATE." Results 1821 - 1840 of 2,184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2010, 7:59 am by Gary Nitzkin
In Jerman v Carlisle, et al, the defendant law firm transmitted a collection letter to Ms. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:59 am by Gary Nitzkin
In Jerman v Carlisle, et al, the defendant law firm transmitted a collection letter to Ms. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 10:37 am
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition of Geertson Seed Farms Brief in opposition of the federal respondent Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of the American Farm Bureau Federation et al. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 6:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
The stay application (Hoillingsworth, et al., v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 9:50 am by gstasiewicz
Clinton, et al. on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia). [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am by Erin Miller
UPDATE, Jan. 7: Today United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP)   United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 9:28 am by Brannon Denning
A case study, or even data gleaned from briefs filed in school speech cases, would have been helpful to a reader seeking to gauge the size of the costs schools bear as a result of Tinker et al. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP)   Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46)   Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks v… [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 1:58 am
Walgreens et al (CAFC 2009-1237) precedential Judge DYK penned this opinion, with which Judge Bryson concurred. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
In the Chrysler bankruptcy case (Indiana State Police Pension Trust, et al., v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron LLC (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) District Court S D California.: Evidence relating to re-examination proceedings excluded from trial: Presidio Components Inc., v. [read post]