Search for: "STATE EX REL. v. Court of Appeals" Results 1821 - 1840 of 2,056
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2009, 6:40 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit weighed in on this issue in its decision in U.S. ex rel. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 1:20 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKGovernmentRelator's Sole Cognizable FCA Claim Rejected As 'Publicly Disclosed' Under §3730(e)(4)(A)United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 4:54 am
In that case, it was clearly stated by Hale J that where: "An asset which was taken into account and correctly valued at the date of the hearing changes value within a relatively short time owing to natural processes of price fluctuation" ... [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 12:38 pm
How about the one where he analogizes the conduct here to Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union: "See United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 10:00 pm
We veered off into food to read The People ex rel. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:58 am
State of Wyoming, ex rel, Wyoming Workers' Safety and Compensation DivisionCitation: 2009 WY 32Docket Number: S-07-0203Appeal from the District Court of Campbell County, Honorable Michael N. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 5:14 pm
    First, the holding of the case, People ex rel. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 4:26 am by Jason C. Brown
" The court found that the district court considered the statutory factors of wife's financial resources relative to her ongoing expenses. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:30 am
Arnold, Judge.Representing Appellant State, ex rel., Arnold: Ron Arnold, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Representing Appellees Ommen and Padilla: Bruce A. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:12 am
State of Wyoming ex rel., University Of WyomingCitation: 2009 WY 19Docket Number: S-07-0269Appeal from the District Court of Albany County, Honorable Wade E. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 12:27 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeApplication Note Clarified Scope of Guidelines Increase; Ex Post Facto Clause Not Implicated United States, appellee v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 3:29 am
  The argument is premised on a 1976 Supreme Court decision, State ex rel. [read post]