Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 1821 - 1840 of 6,065
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2018, 1:59 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
For capital gains purposes, your realized gain or loss is figured by calculating the difference between your sale price and your basis. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Australian High Court’s rejection of INS v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:52 am by Louise Pearce
Lord Justice Sales, who delivered the main judgment, was guided by the reasoning of the House of Lords in Customs and Excise Commissioners v Barclays Bank plc [2006] UKHL 28, which determined that a defendant’s duty of compliance is owed to the court, of which the remedy for non-compliance is punishment for contempt, not civil damages. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:46 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Even if the value of your shares went up and down significantly, if there’s no sale or disposition, there’s nothing to report. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:16 am by Jani Ihalainen
Ahead of a CJEU decision, Advocate General Øe gave their opinion of this question.The case of The Scotch Whisky Association v Michael Klotz dealt with the production and sale of a whisky called "Glen Buchenbach" in Germany by Mr Klotz. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:16 am by Jani Ihalainen
Ahead of a CJEU decision, Advocate General Øe gave their opinion of this question.The case of The Scotch Whisky Association v Michael Klotz dealt with the production and sale of a whisky called "Glen Buchenbach" in Germany by Mr Klotz. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:49 am by Peter Mahler
 Add to that the fact that Paul, once he became Ametal’s controlling shareholder and Piccinini’s sole owner, took on a potentially divided loyalty as both landlord and tenant, and you’ve got a sure-fire recipe for dissension on the part of Richard and Peter who have every incentive to force a sale of the real estate or a buy-out of their shares. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 8:24 am by CFM Admin
Effective January 1, 2018 we are delighted to announce that David C. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 3:50 am by Peter Mahler
Judge Fahey’s opinion, drawing upon the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s 2004 ruling in Anastos v Sable, agreed with the m [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 12:37 am by JR Chaves
INAP, 1986) El derecho y el revés: diálogo epistolar sobre leyes, abogados y jueces, mano a mano con Tomás-Ramón Fernández (Ariel, 1998). [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Accordingly, the Plaintiff is in breach of the implied condition in section 16(2) of the Sale of Goods Act, RSA 2000, c S-2 (the Act) and, according to the Defendant, it is entitled to damages of $10,000.00 – the return of its deposit. [read post]