Search for: "See v. See" Results 1821 - 1840 of 122,078
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2024, 6:05 am by Adam Klasfeld
” At its core, Weinstein’s case simply applied the long-established rules of the more than century-old case of People v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On April 24, 2024, President Biden signed into law the 21st Century Peace through Strength Act (the Act) as part of a broader foreign aid package providing funding to Taiwan, Ukraine, and Israel. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:26 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Douangham and two other suspects were accused of entering the V & V Market on Yosemite Boulevard while armed with a firearm on Jan. 25, 2011. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  If retirements remain underfunded, expect participants to look for someone to blame (see discussion in next section). [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:01 pm by Kevin
In fact, they might actually see that as relevant to the murder charges. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:17 am by Jan von Hein
The plaintiff sees in this request the risk of a contrary outcome to the British decision, as the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the Romanian procedure lacks clarity and predictability (ECHR, X. and Y. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Am., 219 AD2d 454, 454 [1st Dept 1995], lv denied 87 NY2d 804 [1995]; see Ewald v Erie Ins. [read post]