Search for: "State v Matthews" Results 1821 - 1840 of 3,605
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2016, 6:06 am
Roper, Stanford University, on Thursday, September 1, 2016 Tags: Basic, Disclosure, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:41 am by Amy Howe
” In the Los Angeles Times, Michael Hiltzik reports that the “minefield” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg predicted in the wake of Burwell v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 2:40 pm by William Theaker
Pavlovich's appeal is similar to the major case on the trade secret issue, DVD CCA v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am by David Kris
To an observer from the United States, one of the most striking things about Israel, and the Middle East in general, is how small it is. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
  If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees,  you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 6:27 am
Loseman, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Saturday, July 30, 2016 Tags: Class actions, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fraud-on-the-Market, Halliburton, Merger litigation,Omnicare v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 8:19 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Bill of particulars — Notice to defendant or limitation on state This case is an unspeakable tragedy—for the victim, but also for the defendant, and for the community that they shared. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Law creates idea that the market is separate from the state. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:24 pm by raoneeri
At the conference, he delivered a presentation entitled “LGBT Employment Discrimination in the United States post-Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:15 am
But Chambers does not go so far as to hold that a defendant is denied a fair opportunity to defend himself whenever a state rule  excludes favorable evidence, see United States v. [read post]