Search for: "State v. Argus "
Results 1821 - 1840
of 85,023
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2016, 4:25 am
Chris Dunn Kelly v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:56 am
The case is McComish, et al., v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am
For advantages to be capable of being categorised as aid within the meaning of that Article , they must, first, be granted directly or indirectly through State resources, and, second, be imputable to the State (Case C‑303/88 Italy v Commission [1991]; Case C‑482/99 France v Commission [2002]; Case C-126/01 GEMO [2003]).The Court furthermore held that it followed from the wording of Art. 87(1) EC that only advantages granted directly or indirectly… [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:32 am
On appeal, Grand River argues that the default judgment must be set aside because (1) the State failed to comply with the rules governing the service of process on foreign corporations; and (2) the district court did not have personal jurisdiction over Grand River when it entered the default judgment. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 12:36 am
Today is the first Monday in October, and the first case up on the SCOTUS docket is Kahler v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:30 am
Dissent in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 5:12 am
Here is the opinion in Gustafson v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:18 am
Citing Barrett v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
Morrison (2000) and United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:00 am
In Gilbert v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 11:31 am
Starbucks and Winans v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 3:21 am
Wallace dissented, arguing that the state's application of harmlessness was reasonable.U.S. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am
United States Supreme Court Gonzalez v Google and Twitter v Taamneh. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 5:28 pm
Triantyfyllos Tafas v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:39 pm
The IJ argued the Kelo case before the U.S. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:31 am
Plaintiff in Reese v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:15 am
Virginia in 1967, when only 17 states still banned interracial marriage; or Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
While most everyone’s attention understandably has been focused on the constitutional challenge to the insurance-maintenance provision of the ACA being argued in Court this morning, the other substantive challenge before the Court this week—namely, the argument by the 26 plaintiff States that Congress’s manner of expanding Medicaid eligibility in the ACA is unconstitutional (being argued tomorrow afternoon)—has mostly slipped under the radar. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm
The case at issue – Moore v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:27 am
Since at least 1924, when the Supreme Court endorsed it in United States v. [read post]
