Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 1821 - 1840
of 15,315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2017, 11:18 am
§ 1225(b)(2)(C). [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:04 am
He did so based on respondent's stated intention, to introduce expert testimony. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 8:40 am
United States: In Arthur Anderson LLP v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:21 am
S. 167, Meese v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:48 pm
Yesterday, Advocate General Trstenjak`s opinion in case C-533/07 (Falco Privatstiftung und Rabitsch) was published. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 10:32 am
The targeted sections include 2(b) and 3(c), which require a majority of voters statewide to be in favor of a proposed amendment in order to successfully pass a ballot measure. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
§ 552(b)(7)(C). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 4:13 pm
B. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 1:36 pm
Today, design patent law is in the weakest and most confused state since before the Supreme Court’s landmark 1871 decision of Gorham v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 8:46 am
(c) The implementation of Executive Order 13769 has been delayed by litigation. [read post]
29 Sep 2024, 3:54 am
On 29 June 2020, Ghibli S.R.L. filed an opposition to this registration on the basis of its earlier EU figurative mark 17 931 716 designating classes 18 and 25, based on Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR.AnalysisRelying explicitly on Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR, the Opposition Division divided its analysis into several steps. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:20 pm
T.R.A.P. 24(b); State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
STACIE B. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 6:42 am
She responds by noting that her supervisor, Mariano, spelled out "b-i-t-c-h" in speaking with her in January 2015. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:45 pm
§ 201(b). [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:57 pm
Jude Medical, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 7:00 am
Penny Company, Inc .v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 10:27 am
EPA argued that the case should be dismissed because of (a) improper venue; (b) lack of standing; and (c) mootness. [read post]
