Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 29,271
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2009, 1:30 am
Wyeth v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 11:49 am
On June 28, 2024, the United States Supreme Court sent a long, cold shiver through the ranks of Federal agencies in its landmark decision in the case of Loper Bright v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Rapanos v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:21 am
“[S]tate laws are generally not applicable to tribal Indians on an Indian reservation except where Congress has explicitly provided that state law shall apply. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
One year ago tomorrow, in West Virginia v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:41 pm
In CompuCredit Corp. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:47 pm
Now consider the Fifth Circuit’s decision yesterday in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:29 am
The cancellation of such a large sum involves a modification far beyond anything that was contemplated by Congress in 2003.The Biden Administration replied to this by stating it was also given the power to “waive” requirements of the Student Loan Act, and this would be a waiver of the obligation to repay the amount borrowed. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 1:45 pm
Aroostook Band of Micmacs v. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 2:09 pm
It first stated that the taxing power of Congress extended to any "gain derived from capital, from labor, or from both combined", citing Eisner v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
In HIRA Educational Services North America v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 6:16 am
Kerry by ruling that Congress lacks Art. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:55 am
Maryland v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 12:49 am
In State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 11:26 am
The Court granted certiorari to decide that question in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
Claiborne Hardware Co. or Rumsfeld v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:39 am
Versiglio v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
By virtue of a 2003 ruling of the state’s highest court, in Goodridge v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 1:16 pm
Costa, 539 U.S. 90, 100 (2003), as establishing a general rule that unless Congress clearly states otherwise, nothing in the law turns on whether evidence is direct or circumstantial. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:55 am
The Attorney General of New Hampshire argues that the correct procedural rule is the rule of United States v. [read post]
