Search for: "State v. Country" Results 1821 - 1840 of 26,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2019, 3:16 pm by Unknown
David Bernhardt (Land into Trust) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlNavajo Nation v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:18 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Further, the United States argued that Texas, not being harmed by DAPA, lacked standing under the constitution to even bring the suit to federal court.Texas, on behalf of itself and many other states that joined the suit, asserted that it would suffer significant administrative costs [i.e. providing drivers licenses and other government services] devoted to a group of people who are in the country illegally.Chief Justice John Roberts, active during the extended oral… [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
-EU Extradition and Mutual Legal Assistance Agreements and the other related bilateral instruments between the United States and European Union Member States. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:03 pm by NARF
Sims (State Criminal Jurisdiction Over Non-Indians in Indian Country) Four petitions for certiorari were denied on 10/3/22: Acres v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 2:53 pm by Unknown
Department of the Interior (Trust Relationship)State of California v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm by Matt Murphy
No other state in the country erects such a high burden on a defendant to prevent an unconstitutional execution. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 10:43 am by Jessica C. Diamond
In an interesting recent unpublished decision, Flynn v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 11:17 am by Kent Scheidegger
Judge Ed Carnes for the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 6:29 am by Peter Margulies
As the Supreme Court noted in a case cited by Tigar, Rosenberg v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm by Susan Rose-Ackerman
If imported to the United States, congressional review would freeze rulemaking for all but the most anodyne texts—even if it could circumvent the holding in INS v. [read post]