Search for: "State v. Daniel" Results 1821 - 1840 of 5,630
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2018, 11:13 am by Adam Feldman
For example, the majority and separate opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
” At Constitution Daily, Scott Bomboy highlights Janus v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 1:13 pm by Deepak Gupta
(In addition, as Daniel Hemel recently observed, there are some limited tools that can be employed at the state and local level, like disclosure requirements and the use of market power to police government contractors.) [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
Louisiana, a cert petition asserting that the state failed to comply in a murder case with its obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence under Brady v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here, for instance, is the view of Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg in Van Orden v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 6:00 pm by Howard Bashman
“The Arbitration Fight Isn’t Over: How states can counteract the Supreme Court’s awful ruling in Epic Systems v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 5:00 am by Rick Hills
Daniel (in the latest round) argues that the best reading of Murphy's definition of acceptable federal preemption excludes all "direct" federal prohibitions on state taxation and regulation. [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:49 am by Jeff Schmitt
  Illya Somin  and Rick Hills  argue that Murphy is relatively narrow, while Daniel Hemel and Brian Galle contend that it has broad implications. [read post]