Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 21,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm
Discrimination/RetaliationHiatt v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:37 am
Plaintiff states in this federal lawsuit that it owns a family of trademarks featuring the UL mark, including a "UL-in-a-circle" certification mark and the UL service mark. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 4:01 am
August 16, 2016 - 2 PM: Theatrical Stage Employees Union Local No. 2 of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States and Canada v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 3:06 am
Vardhman Sancheti v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:00 pm
Post By Blog Staff In Royal Crown Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 3:09 am
August 16, 2016 - 2 PM: Theatrical Stage Employees Union Local No. 2 of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States and Canada v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:52 am
Supreme Court today in Iancu v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:23 am
The Supreme Court of the United States yesterday announced its decision in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:32 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has given its ruling today in Case C-20/14 BGW Marketing- & Management-Service GmbH v Bodo Scholz, following a request by the German Bundespatentgericht for a preliminary ruling from the CJEU back in January 2014. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:22 am
" Recot Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 12:10 pm
’” (quoting In re Marks, 300 Ga. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 4:27 am
Cubatabaco v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 6:19 am
The Sixth Circuit does not require that excessive force claims allege excessive marks or extensive physical damage. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
KG v Stokke A/S, Stokke Nederland BV, Peter Opsvik and Peter Opsvik A/S was decided on 18 September, but this Kat -- who has been beset by a succession of happy distractions -- has only just got round to writing it up for the weblog. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 9:07 pm
§ 1071(b)(1) seeking judicial review of the TTAB's March 2009 decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 4:05 am
In Clark v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 6:30 am
This collection shows how important it is, despite the constant temptation to compression, not to lose sight of the contexts and nuances which qualify and illuminate so many leading authorities.TOC after the jump. 1 R v Pease (1832) MARK WILDE AND CHARLOTTE SMITH2 Burón v Denman (1848) CHARLES MITCHELL AND LESLIE TURANO3 George v Skivington (1869) DAVID IBBETSON4 Daniel v Metropolitan Railway Company (1871) MICHAEL LOBBAN5 Woodley v… [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 2:29 am
Forum March 15, 2011), citing cases from U.S. federal courts and an early UDRP decision that succinctly states what the complainant must offer to satisfy its burden, British Heart Foundation .v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 4:15 am
Since first filing their United States trademark opposition suit in 2015, Monster has continued their court battle against the Raptors for the last four years with no known... [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 5:00 am
Mark A. [read post]
