Search for: "State v. Quick" Results 1821 - 1840 of 4,835
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2017, 11:25 pm
In referring the question on Art 3(a) as to what was required for a product to be protected by a basic patent, he stated that he was “encouraged by what the [CJEU] said in Actavis v Sanofi and Actavis v Boehringer to believe that there is a realistic prospect of the Court providing further and better guidance to that which it has hitherto provided” (para 91). [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:35 pm by Anthony Zaller
” The California Supreme Court was quick to act based on the Viking decision, and in August 2022, granted review of Adolph v. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 6:55 am by Holly
g=94e25975-2600-492d-8c48-508641e11f51 [15] https://mckinneylaw.iu.edu/practice/law-reviews/iiclr/pdf/vol31p61.pdf [16] Id. [17] E.g., Gray v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
  He described the circuit split leading to FTC v Actavis currently pending in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:59 pm
Follow us on this quick legal journey (judges, ask a PD to help you out on the law)In New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:36 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The New York Times reports on Judge Walker’s new decision in Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm by Sheppard Mullin
The plaintiffs aggregation theory is reminiscent of the 1949 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Standard Oil Co. of California v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 9:19 pm
A few thoughts after a quick read: 1) The personal jurisdiction analysis as to the Mitchell Commission and Sports Illustrated claims takes a very narrow approach to Calder v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 2:41 am by Rose Hughes
In this respect, the decision of the Federal Court in Ono was an outlier that the Full Court has been quick to overturn. [read post]
5 Nov 2006, 6:57 am
As always, the Lexicon provides a quick and dirty summary with an eye to law students (especially first-year law students) with an interest in legal theory. [read post]