Search for: "State v. Register" Results 1821 - 1840 of 13,689
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm by Andrew Hamm
State courts’ general jurisdiction over out-of-state businesses In Cooper Tire & Rubber Company v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 7:43 am by Tian Lu
As to the confusion and misidentification stated in the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, in addition to the examples provided by Article 4(1) of the SPC Interpretation, i.e. the misunderstanding in terms of having commercial affiliation or licensing relation, the court also added examples of ‘commercial titling and advertising endorsement’. [read post]
United States limiting claims that can be brought under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act Takeaways from the December 2021 DOJ and FTC Virtual Public Workshop discussing efforts to promote competitive labor markets and worker mobility Best practices for updating and structuring agreements and policies to adequately protect company assets and trade secrets, including addressing the challenge for multi-state employers of an increasing divergence of state laws and remote… [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 7:36 am by Camilla Hrdy
You can't make Fred register his mark until he steps out of the state of Ohio. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm by Sophia Tang
Group actions require all claimants to be identified and entered in a group register (“opt-in”) and are therefore expensive to administer, which renders them commercially unviable if each individual claim is small and if the aim is to spread the cost of litigation across a large number of claimants. [read post]
In the recent decision of the IPEC in Stone v Wenman, the court reiterated and applied some key principles in the law of passing off. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Oracle,” to questions about the copyright registration system and state sovereign immunity. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Matthew Waxman
The combined cases—referred to collectively as Arver v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 1:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s Morrison v National Australia Bank decision, nevertheless were seeking to avail themselves of a U.S. court by “framing their accusations as derivative breach-of-duty claims against corporate directors. [read post]