Search for: "State v. Russell" Results 1821 - 1840 of 2,716
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm by Anna Christensen
  [Disclosure:  Akin Gump and Howe & Russell represent the petitioner in the case.] [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm by Amy Howe
[Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Abbott, Diane Kindermann, Glen Hansen, Brian Russell and Dan Cucchi Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2016 2nd Quarter CEQA update. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am by INFORRM
The ABC has abandoned its truth defence in a defamation case brought against it by former Australian special forces soldier Heston Russell over claims he was involved in shooting and killing an Afghan prisoner. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
Jeremy gives the floor to Nick Briggs and Kerry Russell (Shakespeares), who report on 118 Data Resource Limited v IDS Data Services Limited and others [2014] EWHC 3629 (Ch), a High Court, England and Wales, ruling of Deputy Judge David Halpern QC, in which they represented the defendants. [read post]
3 May 2009, 11:29 am
A classic Souter concurrence reads: "I am not through regretting that my position in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:25 am by Erin Miller
For the opinion in the patent case Bilski v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
14 May 2018, 9:51 am by Amy Howe
The justices asked the U.S. solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Osage Wind v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 4:55 am by Amy Howe
United States, holding that the pretrial restraint of a criminal defendant’s untainted asset violates the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-5227, and Freidus v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by John Elwood
  (Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioner in Lane.) [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
United States, 12-223, and Pleau v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:22 am by Edith Roberts
” In Prawfsblog, Jack Preis discusses Manuel v. [read post]