Search for: "State v. Save"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 11,760
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm
United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 5:40 pm
From People v. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 8:21 am
However, not all students benefited equally: Black students had little access to GI Bill benefits and, even a decade after Brown v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:30 am
UAGPPJA does so by “providing a more streamlined and predictable process, saving state funds and conserving judicial resources, and reducing the possibility for abuse and expense of the alleged incapacitated person and that person’s family and caretakers” (see id.; Schwaber & Kafer, P.C. v Alpizar, Index No. 157599/2020, 2021 WL 408231, at *2 [Sup Ct, New York County Feb. 5, 2021]). [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 7:30 pm
In doing so, they may have saved the environment, and by extension Canada’s future. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 9:07 pm
Citing Trump v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
They argued that their clients shouldn’t have to pay taxes (United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 7:22 pm
§ 71.93(8)(b), which requires state agencies to enter into an agreement with the Department of Revenue for collecting long-term debts. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 10:04 am
Ngnoguem v Milton Keynes Council (2020] EWCA Civ 396 We’ve seen this prefigured in Stanley v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council (2020) EWCA Civ 1458 (our note), but the relevant parts of that judgment on late reviews were strictly obiter, as the court had found that there was an agreement to extend time. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 7:27 am
C-64/20 UH v An tAire Talmhaíochta Bia agus Mara, Éire and An tArd-Aighne concerned the role that a Member State’s court has in case this Member State fails to transpose a Directive into national law. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 10:00 pm
Judge Norris' ruling in Tiger Lily, LLC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 7:08 am
By communication dated 18 May 2020 the Board informed the parties that the oral proceedings had been rescheduled for 8 February 2021.V. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm
Miller, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law McGirt v. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 4:54 pm
IndiaUmesh Kumar v. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 12:41 pm
The statutes are not saved by their mens rea requirements. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 2:00 am
Frith et al. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 5:38 pm
The bill would outlaw abortion in the state in all cases except to save the life of a pregnant woman in a medical emergency, with no allowance for an abortion under any other circumstances, including for cases of rape or incest. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 12:22 pm
In State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 8:00 am
Besides the statute of limitations, the plaintiff’s state law claim would be barred unless they were saved through application of either the relation-back rule of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 15(c) or equitable tolling, see e.g., Donald v. [read post]
