Search for: "State v. Wright" Results 1821 - 1840 of 1,865
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2025, 7:45 am by Evan George
  Storm clouds for oil: Liberty Energy, the oil company founded by Trump’s own Energy Secretary Chris Wright, is reporting falling profits and “storm clouds on the horizon” partly due to Trump’s threatened tariffs, writes E&E News’ Benjamin Storrow. [read post]
7 May 2007, 1:59 am
Last Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO CIVIL SERVICE & PENSIONS S5467 LIBOUS -- Relates to driving while intoxicated while in a position of care Same as A 8061 BLURB : V & T L. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:38 am by Cyberleagle
The Ministers are Oliver Dowden MP (Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport); Caroline Dinenage MP (Minister for Digital and Culture) and Baroness Williams (Lords Minister, Home Office). [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
v=9KLy150NR_U&eurl=http://www.celebstoner.com/news/marijuana-news/marijuana-advocate-author-dr. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm by Lawrence Solum
Possibly it serves to bring this notion into relief to state it in algebraic terms: if the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B less than PL.United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 4:46 am
Secretary of State) visit to Calgary on May 13, 2009; Michael Chertoff's (former U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
It's a journey that takes us back to a time before most of us were born, long before the Voting Rights Act, and the Civil Rights Act, Brown v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 2:22 am
First Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO CODES Last Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO CODES S5457 THOMPSON -- Relates to the penalty for violating certain provisions requiring a stop at a railroad crossing Same as A 6300 BLURB : V & T L. penalty rr crossing First Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION Last Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION S5458 THOMPSON -- Makes causing physical injury to a… [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
”  One might compare this, ruefully, with the fact that not only Holder, but also his boss, the former President of the Harvard Law Review and a former member of the University of Chicago Law School faculty, never once offered an interesting observation about the United States Constitution and the vision presumably underlying it nor indicated any deep interest in molding the federal judiciary through judicial appointments. [read post]