Search for: "Stock v. Stock"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 8,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2015, 8:37 am
NAF Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 1:43 pm
Paramount Communications Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
In Sciabacucchi v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 2:39 pm
In short, the court stated that Defendants were attempting to impose Revlon duties, as applied to Maryland law in Shenker v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 1:37 am
High Court (Criminal Division) Hall, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2753 (24 November 2011) Levesconte v Regina [2011] EWCA Crim 2754 (24 November 2011) DM, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2752 (24 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Howard -Jones v Tate [2011] EWCA Civ 1330 (24 November 2011) Pattni v First Leicester Buses Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1384 (24 November 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Bibb v Bristol City Council [2011] EWHC 3057… [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:05 am
” In SEC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
In Sobol v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Mirvis, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, June 3, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Acquisition premiums, Arbitrage, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Fair values, Leveraged acquisitions, Management, Merger litigation, Private equity, Shareholder value The Effect of Staggered Boards on Stock Value: New Evidence Posted by Yakov Amihud, New York University Stern School of Business, on Saturday, June 4, 2016 Tags: Airgas v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:39 am
Background In the Rafferty case, two ADP employees, Kristi Mork and Nicole Rafferty, agreed to restrictive covenants in exchange for an award of company stock. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 7:31 am
A group of professors of American and German securities law submitted an amicus brief to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Elliott Associates v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:58 am
In Estate of Adell v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:12 pm
This narrow interpretation of Section 109 was stretched to the breaking point by the Delaware Supreme Court’s en banc decision in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 12:51 pm
That is the 1920 case called Eisner v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
"); Braten v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm
In its June 2014 decision in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 4:00 am
Pribetic for bringing to light the case of the day, Third Point LLC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 12:32 pm
Perry v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 1:15 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 6:33 am
The parties agreed that Aronson v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 3:11 pm
Taken to its logical extreme, this trend easily could result in someone being deemed a controller even in the absence of stock ownership. [read post]
