Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 9,109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2015, 2:25 am
by Dennis Crouch In Teva v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 5:40 am
Marceaux v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 7:34 am
but not to use them to commit homicide.State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:51 am
Judge Schwab instead compared its trademark value to marks such as Kodak and Lifesavers, which are highly distinctive marks, thus indicating a high level of legal protection. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:20 am
Court decisions basically recognize it is not appropriate to grant the same level of copyright protection to industrial products as in the case of fine arts. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:05 am
See, e.g., Seaton v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:28 am
., fka Hewlett-Packard Company v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 8:17 pm
Stockman v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
In Regents v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am
Clement insists that the balancing test in Mathews v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:35 am
Brian Corderyby Nadine Bleach The Court of Appeal, overturning Birss J’s decision, decided that in the case of TQ Delta v ZyXEL, the answer was no. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 12:28 pm
Huddle, demanding the government grant the lawyers security clearances “commensurate with the level” of the classified information their clients possess. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:16 am
State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:29 am
See Moltner v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 11:17 am
S602aCriminal law -- Conspiracy to distribute cocaine base and powder cocaine -- Sentencing -- Federal guidelines -- Offense level -- Quantity of drugs -- Circuit court of appeals' order requiring petitioners' resentencing based on the district courts' categorical rejection of the 100:1 crack-to-powder cocaine ratio and substitution of its own 20:1 ratio conflicts with Kimbrough v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 10:00 am
We're of the opinion that, as far as this case is concerned, the AT's decision missed the mark.For a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 7:53 am
One question here is the level of deference that should be given to the USITC in carrying out its mandate. - Dennis [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 2:30 pm
But such towers are subject to zoning and regulatory approvals at the state and local levels, and states and localities, which traditionally control land use, do not always want new towers in their backyards. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:28 am
In Edwards Lifesciences v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:28 am
In Edwards Lifesciences v. [read post]
