Search for: "US v. Shields" Results 1821 - 1840 of 4,946
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
" In the words of the court, "Accordingly, certain files, though otherwise confidential, may be subject to disclosure to the general public pursuant to, inter alia, the Freedom of Information Law.The court also distinguished between expunging such information from an individual's "personal records" and the employer "retain[ing] necessary information in another [confidentially kept] file for use as a shield in any proceeding brought against them"… [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm by Matthew Bush
Ct.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionReply of petitioner Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Montana, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 5:42 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
US Courts Celebrate Juror Appreciation Week During the first week of May, the U.S. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:19 pm by Kim Zetter
The search has raised questions about the basis investigators used to obtain the warrant and whether it violated state and federal shield laws. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
Section 230 shields users of interactive computer services from liability arising from information provided by third parties. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 11:21 am by Ilya Somin
Nonetheless, yesterday the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld the constitutionality of the draft registration system, in a short per curiam opinion in National Coalition for Men v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The law is very clear that an agreement to perform unaudited services does not shield an accountant from liability because an accountant must perform all services in accordance with the standard of a reasonable accountant under similar circumstances, which includes reporting fraud that is or should be apparent (see 1136 Tenants’ Corp. v Rothenberg & Co., 36 AD2d 804 [1st Dept 1971], affd 30 NY2d 585 [1972]; see also William Iselin & Co., Inc. v Mann… [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
The agreements here are not—they restrict advertising regardless of whether the ads are likely to be confusing and, apparently, regardless of whether competitors actually use the trademark term (requiring negative keywords). [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 12:03 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held, in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 8:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Here's an excerpt from a 2016 Ninth Circuit oral argument in an employment discrimination case, Reynaga v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiffs were allegedly introduced to the idea of using a tax shelter to acquire the property by Lance Valdez (“Valdez”). [read post]