Search for: "United States v. Choice"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 6,612
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2007, 1:35 am
United States, 943 F.Supp. 159, 168 (D.R.I.1996) (articulating the circuit split); see also Ugo Colella & Adam Bain, The Burden of Proving Jurisdiction Under the Federal Torts Claim Act: A Uniform Approach to Allocation, 67 Fordham L.Rev. 2859 (1999). [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 7:49 am
Judge Marcus wrote that the Court was bound by United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 2:19 am
See Exhibit A (InterDigital Communications Corp. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:29 pm
" In 1802, "prints" were added (2 Stat. 171); in 1831 "musical compositions" were added (4 Stat. 436); in 1856 "dramatic compositions" were added (11 Stat. 138); and in 1856 "photographs" were added (13 Stat. 540).The primary issue addressed by the United States Supreme Court in 1884 was whether "Congress had the constitutional right to protect photographs and negatives thereof by copyright. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 12:48 pm
These are the articles from September: International: Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting XLIV Concludes with Adoption of Several New Measures, Decisions, and Resolutions United Kingdom: Intellectual Property Office Rules Artificial Intelligence Cannot Patent Inventions Israel: Supreme Court Rules Israeli Courts May Void or Change Choice of Law Provisions in Standard Contracts Between Global Companies and Small Businesses Japan: Children and Family Agency Establishment Act… [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 12:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
Prior to the ruling, federal courts were able to prosecute individuals as young as 15 for material support, but in the wake of the Sessions v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
They know it.Plaintiffs have no choice. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 8:51 am
The question is whether a federal court hearing a state law claim under the Act must apply the forum state’s choice-of-law rules or whether it may apply federal common law. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
’ Martin v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 11:48 am
The Singleton Court explained that while the United States Supreme Court rejected decades ago the notion that a defective indictment necessarily deprives a trial court of jurisdiction, see United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 3:45 pm
Even the United States Supreme Court, I've discovered, has called it the "California District Court of Appeals," and has done so a half-dozen times. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:29 am
” [9] The Court also noted that the English courts (in subsequent cases such as Pearce v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust and Chester v Afshar) had quietly ceased to follow Sidaway‘s adoption of the Bolam test. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 2:59 am
Decision tells the story of how the choice to lodge the Great Seal (imprint above left) (credit) at headquarters of the Secretary of State set the stage for events that culminated in the Supreme Court's landmark opinion on judicial review, Marbury v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 11:34 am
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Arterton, J.) granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all counts. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:37 pm
The Government’s argument: No one seemed all that happy with the United States’ official immunit [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 1:29 pm
Holly Hill Fruit Prods., 75 F.2d 13, 15 (5th Cir. 1935); see United Drug Co. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 5:21 am
" The article, called "Who Can Be President of the United States: The Unresolved Enigma," was written in 1968 by Charles Gordon, then General Counsel of the INS and an adjunct law professor at Georgetown. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:01 pm
Today is the 50th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:04 pm
As the Supreme Court struck down the core of the so-called "Defense of Marriage Act" in United States v. [read post]
