Search for: "United States v. King"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 3,018
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2013, 5:11 am
Delta towns like Money and Morgan City were (and remain) part of the most impoverished region in the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 10:37 pm
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (Lance M. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 10:00 am
A chorus of elite Australian lawyers told King George V and the public that the appointment of Isaacs on the advice of the Australian Prime Minister would be invalid under the Australian Constitution. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am
’” (Catholic Charities of Sacramento, 32 Cal. 4th 527, 565 (2004), quoting United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:56 pm
In his 1787 Defense of the Constitutions of the United States he elaborates on this point: “If in England there has ever been such a thing as a government of laws, was it not magna charta? [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 6:02 am
At Buzzfeed, Chris Geidner profiles Edith Windsor, the plaintiff in this Term’s United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
United States, 12-223, and Pleau v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
This is especially helpful because the legal and colloquial definitions of monopoly differ throughout history — the term means something different under the current Sherman Antitrust Act, to someone during the era of trust-busting in early 20th century United States, and to a jurist in 18th century England. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:37 am
Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit certified a question a question on that issue to New York State’s highest appeals court.The case is Georgitsi Realty, LLC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
I’ve written about Kirtsaeng before, see also More on Kirtsaeng v John Wiley, What Kirtsaeng Won’t Answer, The United States “Odd” Kirtsaeng Argument, and Overturn Quality King? [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:08 pm
The Baggage Tractor in this Case A lawsuit was commenced in 2001 in the United States District Court in Brooklyn (usually such a case would be brought in state court but because the parties were citizens of different states, so-called diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:33 am
- United States Constitution, Amendment 4 There is great consensus that the 1765 case of Entick v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
Territorial Limitation of 216.5(a)(2) -- 216.5(a)(2)(i) This new subdivision applies only to claims "occurring" in the counties of Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Orange, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk or Westchester, and their adjacent waters. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
Territorial Limitation of 216.5(a)(2) -- 216.5(a)(2)(i) This new subdivision applies only to claims "occurring" in the counties of Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Orange, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk or Westchester, and their adjacent waters. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
” At the birth of the United States, copyright was couched in terms of property more often that not. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 10:56 am
This case led to a variation in the United States, the Doctrine of Commercial Impracticality. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 6:30 am
United Virginia Bank, 243 Va. 94, 110 (1992). [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 3:12 pm
On November 9, 2012, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear a criminal DNA testing case, Maryland v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 7:35 am
It was primarily raised by the United States, acting as amicus curiae. [read post]
