Search for: "United States v. Provident National Bank"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 2,056
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2010, 2:31 pm
National Australian Bank, Ltd., CA-2, Dkt. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 2:41 am
National Australia Bank case, now before the U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 3:56 pm
Professor Michael McConnell points me to United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 11:12 am
” We affirm the dismissal of the three UCL state law claims because the claims alleging “unfair” and “fraudulent” conduct are preempted by the National Bank Act, and because the allegations of “illegal” conduct fail to state a claim. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:12 pm
Martinez v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:36 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 3:01 pm
Philippine National Bank (9th Cir. 1990), in which the Ninth Circuit held that an individual foreign official acting within the scope of his authority should be considered an “agency or instrumentality” of a foreign state under § 1603(b) of the FSIA. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:02 am
Philippine National Bank (9th Cir. 1990), in which the Ninth Circuit held that an individual foreign official acting within the scope of his authority should be considered an “agency or instrumentality” of a foreign state under § 1603(b) of the FSIA. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
The Celanese plant, a sprawling complex on the banks of the New River between Narrows and Pearisburg, makes materials used for cigarette filters and other products. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 12:27 am
In the early nineteenth century, most notably in two cases involving the Second Bank of the United States – Bank of the United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am
It may be subject to editorial revision.In the case of Richard Anderson v. the United Kingdom,The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:Lech Garlicki, President,Nicolas Bratza,Giovanni Bonello,Ljiljana Mijovic,Päivi Hirvelä,Ledi Bianku,Nebojša Vucinic, judges,and Lawrence Early, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 19 January 2010,Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:PROCEDURE#… [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
Legal background: fees in Title VII casesTitle VII provides that:In any action or proceeding under this subchapter the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the Commission or the United States, a reasonable attorney's fee (including expert fees) as part of the costs, and the Commission and the United States shall be liable for costs the same as a private person.42 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 6:52 am
On February 23, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Hertz v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:43 pm
Crocker National Bank v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:18 am
So, during oral arguments at the Supreme Court on Monday in Astrue v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:46 pm
The following essay, part of our Race and the Supreme Court program, is by Gail Heriot, a member of the United States Commission on Civil Rights and a professor of law at the University of San Diego. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:31 pm
The migration of credit card operations to South Dakota and Delaware began with the Supreme Court's decision in Marquette National Bank v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
July 2, 2009). http://kuex.us/71aa Doc Retention and Destruction: United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 11:15 am
“Foreign Body” includes the United Nations and any agency thereunder, the European Union and any agency thereunder, an international judiciary, the International Monetary Fund, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, the World Bank and the Socialist International. 2. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:15 am
One example is Chase Bank USA v. [read post]
