Search for: "WILSON v. STATE" Results 1821 - 1840 of 3,375
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
On the same day judgment was handed down in the case of R (on the application of Jefferies & Ors) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2018] EWHC 3239 (Admin). [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
The 186th edition of the IPKat’s news roundup.DesignsKat friends Nina O’Sullivan and Victoria Wilson reported on the 2017 key design cases brought before both the EU and the UK’s courts in The best and the brightest: key UK and EU design decisions from 2017.Speaking of key decisions, following the DOCERAM v CeramTec CJEU judgement (C-395/16), Kat friend Alexander Haertel discusses the decision in detail and its possible repercussions in German design law on the… [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Anderson sat down with Derek Muller to discuss the independent state legislature doctrine in light of the pending Supreme Court case Moore v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 8:56 am by Meg Martin
Mark Stewart of Davis & Cannon, LLP, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Facts/Discussion: The Geringers filed petitions with the Wyoming State Board of Control (Board) for the involuntary abandonment of water rights held by Mark and Sharon Runyan and Robert and Jana Wilson (Appellees) on lands that were formerly in common ownership with the lands on which the Geringers hold water rights. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 6:20 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals blog identifies two examples of this phenomenon from published opinions released in March:PD-0307-09, Ronald Lee Wilson v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 2:53 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In Jensen v. iShares Trust, holders of ETF shares purchased in a secondary market, i.e. not directly from the issuer, attempted to bring a Section 11 suit against the issuer. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
In Daniels v State of NSW in 2015, she had ruled that the satisfaction of the element of reasonableness was one for the jury. [read post]