Search for: "Weeks v. State of Me." Results 1821 - 1840 of 7,293
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2018, 1:19 pm by Giles Peaker
Mayflower Cambridge Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment (1975) 30 P & CR 28  was a planning case, concerning hotel use. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 2:31 pm by Matthew Kahn
  The Supreme Court upheld the legality of those measures in Sale v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 2:49 pm by Elizabeth Kruska
Give me reasons why I should believe this hearsay. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 11:27 am
  Her defense attorney will be waging a strong fight to keep evidence from the jury that she writes the "How to Murder Your Husband" blog.Under a rule of evidence in effect throughout the United States, the judge will have to weigh the probative value of that evidence vs. the prejudicial effect of letting the jury hear it.The judge in the "People v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 9:32 am by Giles Peaker
A stay for a matter of days or weeks, perhaps, but not a year or more. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 9:38 am by Andrew Appel
  In 1870-76, there averaged ten indictments per week nationwide for election fraud. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 1:37 pm by Giles Peaker
The post You ain’t the boss of me (yet) appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
First, the solicitor general’s omnibus brief responded to so many petitions that it couldn’t fit all the captions on the cover – something like that happened to me this week. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:14 am by Florian Mueller
(United States International Trade Commission) in September and in Munich (Munich I Regional Court) in October. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 1:45 pm by Giles Peaker
Camelot Guardian Management Ltd v Khoo (2018) EWHC 2296 (QB) (Not on Bailii for some reason. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:15 am by Eugene Volokh
Last week, Judge Stephen Dillard, chief judge of the Georgia Court of Appeals (and, back in the day, blogger Feddie at Southern Appeal), wrote an interesting concurring opinion (Borgers v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 5:30 am by Kevin
        Related StoriesIn re: Sssotlohiefmjn v. [read post]
” To “defraud the United States” has a specific meaning under U.S. case law: According to Hammerschmidt v. [read post]