Search for: "A. Jackson" Results 1841 - 1860 of 27,905
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2023, 7:54 am by Epstein Becker Green
Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision by the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS). [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 3:11 pm by Evan Lee
Jackson’s opinion began by outlining the structure of Section 924(c). [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:58 am by Michael Stern
In the words of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, written while she was on the district court, it leads to a world in which “the Legislature and the Judiciary are both hopelessly stymied when it comes to addressing alleged abuses by the Executive Branch, such that, ultimately, the President wields virtually unchecked power. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Tom Kosakowski
Jackson State's Ombuds Office serves faculty, staff, and students at one of the largest HBCU's in the U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:15 am by Marcia Coyle
” Justice Jackson wrote: “Hewing to §1983’s text and history (not to mention our precedent and constitutional role), we reject HHC’s request, and reaffirm that ‘laws’ in §1983 means what it says. [read post]
Jackson suggested that the correct course of action pursuant to Garmon would have been to vacate the Washington Supreme Court’s ruling and remand with directions to dismiss Glacier’s complaint without prejudice or stay the proceedings in light of the General Counsel’s complaint. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Gorsuch and Thomas alone excavated history in their concurrence and dissent, respectively (although Justices Sotomayor and Jackson joined Gorsuch’s concurrence, they did not join section II, which explored how framing history bore on Congressional plenary power over tribes). [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by centerforartlaw
By Alec Lesseliers Introduction The British Museum, the Metropolitan Museum of Art (MET), and the Germanisches Nationalmuseum are a few of the world’s most famous and largest history museums with objects in their collection from all over the world. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Given Trump's well-known admiration for Jackson the populist/racist, it's not entirely surprising that Trump would emulate Jackson in treating federal government power as available to serve his own partisan and personal ends.To be sure, the spoils system punished enemies by stripping them of their jobs, not by prosecuting them. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 11:48 am
Her father, the Civil War veteran William Jackson Smart, was a single parent who raised his six children there. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 11:19 am by Giles Peaker
UO v London Borough of Redbridge (2023) EWHC 1355 (Admin) Ms UO and her 3 children, aged 11, 5 and 3, were homeless and had applied to LB Redbridge. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 6:03 pm by Josh Blackman
Part I of his dissent, which Justices Jackson and Kagan did not join, warns about "existential threat to the continued vitality of Tribes. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 2:51 pm by Josh Blackman
Justice Gorsuch's concurrence, which was joined in part by Justices Kagan and Jackson, was 38 pages long. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 12:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
From a Medium post by Brandon Jackson, a Microsoft engineer: Wednesday, May 31, 2023, I finally regained access to my Amazon account after an unexpected and unwarranted lockout that lasted nearly a week, from Thursday, May 25. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm by Ted Max
 Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am by Ted Max
 Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am by Ted Max
 Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]