Search for: "Adams v. New York"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 2,515
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2011, 9:51 am
And Adam Liptak in the New York Times writes: “ … it is perilous to base a conviction on a witness’s identification of a stranger. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm
Yet these new rulings, including J.D.B. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Adam Liptak of the New York Times wrote about a case the Court agreed to hear earlier this year - Perry v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:54 am
Brathwaite in 1977.Adam Liptak talks about this in his New York Times Sidebar column (yes, Liptak's still around). [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 9:22 am
In the New York Times, Adam Liptak discusses Perry v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 7:24 am
Adam Liptak's latest Sidebar column in today's New York Times is, "34 Years Later, Supreme Court Will Revisit Eyewitness IDs. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:45 pm
New York Times columnist Adam Liptak writes in today's Times that this will be the first time the justices take a hard look at eyewitness identifications since 1977.Although the case before the Supreme Court may be limited in its scope, Innocence Project Co-Director Barry Scheck tells Liptak that the case points to the larger issues surrounding misidentification. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm
Supreme Court's recent decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 1:43 pm
DiPadova can be accessed through the Massachusetts court website.Supreme Court to Revisit Eyewitness Identifications: Adam Liptak has this piece in the New York Times about the upcoming U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
See Murray v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 2:27 am
In the case of Todd Roth v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:55 pm
New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905).Nevertheless, the professor in question–who has no particular ties to Justice Breyer, near as I can tell–was quite adamant that I had wronged Breyer, and should at least edit the offending paragraph in subsequent printings of my book.So, while I still don’t see it, maybe as the author I have blinders on. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 10:29 pm
Gaines [Picked by Brendan V. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 9:14 am
Adam Liptak at the New York Times, Debra Cassens Weiss at the ABA Journal, the Wall Street Journal Blog, and Peter J. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 4:10 pm
According to Adam Liptak in his New York Times column, here, “In May [2011] alone, the justices cited dictionaries in eight cases to determine what legislators had meant when they used words like ‘prevent,’ ‘delay’ and ‘report. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and Michele M. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 1:55 pm
Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and Michele M. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:44 am
Briefly: Adam Liptak of the New York Times previews one of next Term’s cases, M.B.Z. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 5:28 pm
"--Sanford V. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:49 pm
“I appreciate that no offense was intended, but she can’t ask for an apology without suggesting that I did something wrong, and that is offensive,” Hill told The New York Times. [read post]
