Search for: "Adams v. United States" Results 1841 - 1860 of 2,685
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2012, 4:52 am
Therefore, it is common that related parties make gifts to their “flesh and blood” rather than have this money go to the Georgia Department of Revenue or the United States Treasury (the IRS). [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 8:52 pm
Therefore, it is common that related parties make gifts to their “flesh and blood” rather than have this money go to the Georgia Department of Revenue or the United States Treasury (the IRS). [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 11:50 am by William Ford
Julia Solomon-Strauss and Stephen Szrom discussed the latest developments in United States v. al-Nashiri. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am by Joshua Matz
” Emphasizing the dispute over state-federal relations in Arizona v. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 6:59 am by John Floyd
  Tenth Circuit Rules §3583(k) Unconstitutional   Last month the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense. [read post]
29 May 2020, 12:32 pm by Adam Feldman
United States, placing him only one word behind Adam Unikowsky, who spoke 4,185 words in Sveen v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:56 pm by Nathan Dorn
In his 1787 Defense of the Constitutions of the United States he elaborates on this point: “If in England there has ever been such a  thing as a government of laws, was it not magna charta? [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 1:01 pm by Taryn Rucinski
 USGS Open-File Report: 2014-1189 Pesticide trends in major rivers of the United States, 1992-2010 2014, Ryberg, Karen R.; Vecchia, Aldo V.; Gilliom, Robert J.; Martin, Jeffrey D. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 10:35 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Grayson Clary discussed the split circuit court opinions on the government’s authority to search electronic devices at the border, focusing on the Eleventh Circuit’s May 23 ruling in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
  A “national of the United States” is defined as “(A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
The Socially Aware blog has commented on the case of United States v. [read post]