Search for: "Akins v. State"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 3,091
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2012, 7:55 pm
Franchisors would need to review and comply with state securities laws, often administered by the same regulatory authority as franchising in merit review registration states, before undertaking such an offering. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:27 pm
Holmes Trucking LLC v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:11 pm
In Espenscheid et al. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 12:39 pm
The Court of Chancery's recent decision in ASB Allegiance Real Estate Fund v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:32 am
There may be no sign over the Chittenden Regional Correctional Facility in Vermont, but for pre-trial detainees, a sign might have read "arbeit macht frei," according to the Second Circuit in McGarry v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:39 pm
The latter panel -- "Hell or High Water" Flooding & Takings Law -- focused on the issues in Arkansas Game & Fish Comm'n v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:41 pm
White Stallion Energy Center, LLC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:41 pm
White Stallion Energy Center, LLC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 9:14 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:12 am
The CPRI provides that most new hires will receive a defined contribution plan, akin to a 401(k) plan, rather than the defined benefit plan employees currently receive. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:05 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:40 am
Sullivan to Regan v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:16 am
If the state sues in civil court, though, the legal actions are titled things like "State of Texas v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 2:35 pm
Well, use of "consent decree" probably doesn't transform the NCAA into a state actor, which the Supreme Court said it wasn't in NCAA v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:48 am
That said, I don’t think we need to get there yet: I think Savannah read the confidentiality statute correctly, and so tweeted only the names of the perpetrators, which she unquestionably had a right to do (Butterworth v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:24 am
” So claimed Lord Pearce in Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd v Shatwell [1965] AC 656. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 6:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:02 am
96/09 P Anheuser-Busch v Bud? [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm
(as stated by the judge). [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:37 pm
(as stated by the judge). [read post]
