Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE" Results 1841 - 1860 of 191,949
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2024, 10:35 pm by Marcel Pemsel
This question is going to be answered in EUIPO v Nowhere (case C-337/22 P) for opposition proceedings and in Shopify v EUIPO (case C-751/22 P) in invalidity proceedings. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:59 pm
My own earlier essays may be accessed here: Cuba Sonic Weapons Affair (43)   Transcript 0:00 Robert but becknell is a retired marine officer who worked for nine years as a NATO civilian Allied 0:06 command transformation before transitioning to private practice and consultancy he has a JD from Maryland 0:12 law an llm from Harvard Law and an MSC from the University of Oxford he resides in North Fork Virginia Mark as a 0:19 Washington DC National Security… [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 3:42 pm
I'd just (1) have liked it to have been clearer (at least to folks like me) earlier in the opinion, and (2) have liked to see the Court of Appeal respond to the above argument about the distinction between what I call "old" versus "new" teachers.That said, I definitely see both sides, and don't think it's an easy case. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 12:34 pm by David Super
      Over the past several months, I have been asked to present to numerous advocacy groups and foundations about the impending demise of Chevron v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 12:23 pm by Guest Author
In the 40 years since, the case has been cited 7,659 times according to Westlaw (and Orin Kerr). [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 11:43 am by Edelboim Lieberman PLLC
But, once a creditor decides to pursue legal action, this can eliminate options that might have otherwise been on the table. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 9:50 am by Will Baude
She did something similar in the consolidated cases in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 9:42 am by Ann Carlson
Headlines about today’s decision in Loper v Raimondo overturning the 40 year-old decision in Chevron v NRDC that granted agencies deference in their interpretation of ambiguous statutes  focus on the “massive power grab,” the decision’s “sweeping” nature and call it a  “blow” to the administrative state. [read post]