Search for: "Battle v. State" Results 1841 - 1860 of 8,255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm by Larissa Morgan
” In September, the parties in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 12:23 pm by Steve Kalar
Prominent crim-law jurists tangle over knotty Weaver.United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:47 am by Dennis Crouch
One way to see this case is as a battle between Parker v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 2:41 am
Stated otherwise, what is the relationship between trademark awareness and brand strength? [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:54 am by Stephen Wermiel
” This battle mirrors some earlier Supreme Court fights. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:11 am by Andrew Keane Woods
This is consistent with the thinking by the Canadian Supreme Court, which upheld a global injunction in 2017 in Google v Equustek. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation On 5 September 2019, Press Gazette had a piece “Rotherham Advertiser wins battle to overturn reporting restrictions on grooming gang members”. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:12 am
 Together with The Picasso Project, the Zervos has been the subject of a long legal battle which ended last week with a decision of the the United States District Court Northern District of California San Jose Division.BackgroundIn 1979, Yves Sicre de Fontbrune, the original plaintiff in the case, acquired Cahiers d’art and the rights to the Zervos.In 1995 Wofsy published The Picasso Project.In 1996, after copies of two volumes of The Picasso Project were… [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:25 am
He described the challenge of clients’ budget and time constraints in battling counterfeits and need for local representation in the jurisdictions where counterfeits pop up like daisies. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
Subscript Law has a graphic explainer for New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]