Search for: "COOPER v. STATE" Results 1841 - 1860 of 7,410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2023, 7:16 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
The Role of Target Regime Type Graeme AM Davies, Kingsley Edney, & Bo Wang, Modelling Chinese Youth Support for Military Intervention in the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: Beyond Nationalism and Militarism Joshua Alley, Elite Cues and Public Attitudes Towards Military Alliances Christoph V. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 3:17 pm by CAFE
Code §192 - Refusal of witness to testify or produce papersUnited States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 6:09 am by David Markus
Liang is a German citizen.At the hearing on Friday morning, Judge Cox said that Liang was a member of a long-term conspiracy and that the scandal was “a stunning fraud on American consumers,” a courthouse observer told Law360.Liang’s attorney, Daniel V. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:09 pm by David Markus
Another example is found in this unpublished opinion from the 11th Circuit, United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:57 am
Cases C-146/13 and C-147/13 Kingdom of Spain v European Parliament and Council of the European Union have now both reached the point at which Advocate General Bot has published his Opinion, which means that all that is left now is for the CJEU to determine whether it will follow his guidance (as happens around 80 per cent of the time) or articulate its own reasoning. [read post]
16 May 2015, 2:44 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
   CASE STYLE: State of Texas v Samara Portfolio Management, LLC et al; Cause No. 2013-35721 in the 80th Judicial District Court of Texas (Harris County)    [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 2:02 pm
First, that Cooperative Banks set up under various state legislations and the Central Enactment of The Multi-State Co-Operative Societies Act, 2002 already possess effective machinery for recovery of loans of their own. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
Cooper, in which the court held on Monday that the Constitution did not give Congress the power to revoke the states’ immunity from suit for copyright infringement in a 1990 law, concluding that the decision “is significant for states in the big picture because the court held the line on its sovereign immunity precedent,” but “as a practical matter, the impact of this case is probably limited. [read post]