Search for: "California Employment Law Letter" Results 1841 - 1860 of 2,237
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm by Editor
#66 External Insights #67 Antitrust Review #68 Jeremy Blachman's Weblog #69 Unlearned Hand #70 Preaching to Perverted #71 QuizLaw #72 Ernie the Attorney #73 Workplace Prof Blog #74 Global Security Law #75 Concurring Opinions #76 David Maister's Blog #78 Human Law #80 Blawg Review #81 Bag and Baggage #82 Votelaw #83 Election Law Blog #85 Freedom to Differ #86 Infamy or Praise #87 Legal Literacy #88 HealthBlawg #89 The Mummer's Veil #90 Minor Wisdom #91 Public… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm by Elie Mystal
A criminal law professor out in California figured out there were grading errors from her fall semester course. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 11:00 am by Jay Shepherd
Jay Shepherd has also spent 13 years running the Boston management-side employment-law boutique Shepherd Law Group. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm by Los Angeles Lawyer
Despite the presence of these laws, there are still employers who willfully and maliciously retaliate against whistleblowers. [read post]
  Also, please keep in mind that certain steps– law firm “insider secrets”– are purposefully excluded. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:48 pm
My current job description reads: "I ran and orchestrated a small family law office in which I enabled the attorneys to instigate, hypothesize, and pinpoint issues related to California Family Law in a more systematized manner. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:30 pm by admin
 California law also explicitly requires employers to engage in a good faith, interactive process to determine reasonable accommodations for disabled employees. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:01 am by J. Benjamin Stevens
Ware Cornell Jr. is a Board Certified Civil Trial Lawyer in Weston, Florida where he primarily practices employment law with the firm of Cornell & Associates P.A. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 5:55 am by Jon Hyman
Cat’s Paw Decision Not Very Employer Friendly – from Michael Fox’s Jottings By An Employer’s Lawyer US Supreme Court Holds Employers May Be Liable Under “Cat's Paw” Theory – from California Workforce Resource Blog U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by Keith Reinfeld
However, as highlighted in Camara, this practice violates the law in a number of states, including, but not limited to, California, Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, and New York. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 2:41 am by Steve Lombardi
As you can see it's not in the black letter of the law, it's in the agreement between you and your employer; so look there first. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:17 am
If so, the interim rules represent a step in the wrong direction for patients residing in states like California. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:54 pm by Jim Walker
Every so often, I will read an article which reminds me why I practice maritime law and represent crew members from around the world. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiffs contend that San Francisco’s sanctuary policies violated state and federal laws. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 8:07 pm by Venkat
The California Labor Code protects employees from discipline or firing based on their "lawful conduct during nonworking hours away from the employer's premises. [read post]