Search for: "Case v. People" Results 1841 - 1860 of 51,940
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2008, 3:21 pm
Even there, the spectre of recall and electoral pressures are never entirely absent.So an interesting duo of death penalty cases today. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:23 pm
But you'd rather dismiss the case, even with prejudice, than give it a shot in his courtroom? [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 12:15 pm
It's another case that, as a practical matter, both increases the authority of the police to combat crime as well as provides a powerful tool for individuals to harass their enemies. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 11:58 am
It holds that even though there's a California Supreme Court case seemingly on point granting the motion to suppress, that case is distinguishable because there the officer actually saw the temporary tag, whereas here the officer didn't bother to look. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:53 am
Plus suggests that perhaps the appeal apparently concerns something that's at issue in a large number of cases and hence worthy of publication and social attention. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 11:42 am
The Cold Case reinvestigated the Boyson homicides, found some additional evidence against David, and in 2004, the district attorney prosecuted David for the murders.David's attorneys moved to dismiss the prosecution based upon the 24-year delay between the murders and the prosecution. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 7:34 pm
At least in my mind.So I was stunned when I read this case. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:06 pm by Dean Freeman
An example of this was underscored recently in the case of Eshelman v. [read post]
7 Jul 2006, 2:28 am
A brief note on the recent House of Lords decision in the case of Jones v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 12:19 am
There has been a lot of buzz about two cases concerned with president-elect Obama's citizenship, Donofrio v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 5:19 am by Aidan Wills, Matrix
Applying the recent ECHR cases of Genovese v Malta (2012) App no. 53124/09 and Kuric v Slovenia (2012) App no. 26828/06, Lady Hale held that ECHR, art 8 is engaged because the denial of citizenship significantly affects a person’s social identity. [read post]