Search for: "Claimant(s)"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 26,363
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2012, 2:19 am
This was a judicial review of Birmingham City Council’s refusal to accept a homeless application by the Claimant, Ms May, ostensibly on the basis that there was no change in facts from her previous application(s). [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 3:48 am
Recently, I have had several workers compensation clients ask me if they needed to allow the insurance companies doctor's to [...] [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:36 am
” Full story Law Society’s Gazette, 25th November 2010 Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 1:22 pm
Jane Lambert Patents Court (Mr Justice Macaroli) Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Ltd and others v Warner Lambert LLC and another [2021] EWHC 2182 (Ch) (30 July 2021)Each of the 35 claimants in these proceedings had been awarded an inquiry as to damages either for losses sustained as a result of an interim injunction that the defendants had agreed to pay or for losses resulting from threats of [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 3:26 am
” Full story Law Society’s Gazette, 9th September 2011 Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
The Judge concluded that the statement was related to the claimant’s political position and not his personal character or conduct therefore the claimant’s application for an injunction was dismissed. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
The claimant alleged that Ziegler failed to disclose material facts regarding the STAMPS investment and that the STAMPS recommendation was at odds with the claimant’s investment objectives. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 8:28 am
Disability Blog & Cases: CIGNA Disability Claim Denial: A Claimant's View Every day disability claimants around the country contact our disability attorneys about a CIGNA disability claim. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:35 am
The Court noted the value of a physical examination to a reliable assessment of a claimant's disability. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 2:03 pm
No Automatic Deference to Claimant’s Physician’s Determination. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
It is the companion claim for those of two other claimants in the same family. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 2:17 am
Aida TohalaBristowsThe High Court has granted the Claimants’ request for declarations of non-infringement (“DNIs”) regarding several national designations of the Defendant’s European Patent for a pemetrexed disodium and vitamin B12 combination in respect of reconstitution of the Claimants’ lyophilised pemetrexed product when reconstituted in dextrose solution. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 1:36 am
Claire Phipps-JonesThe High Court has granted the Claimants’ request for declarations of non-infringement (“DNIs”) regarding several national designations of the Defendant’s European Patent for a pemetrexed disodium and vitamin B12 combination in respect of reconstitution of the Claimants’ lyophilised pemetrexed product when reconstituted in dextrose solution. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 7:07 am
The claimant sustaining injuries from lifting heavy objects on a repetitive basis. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:34 pm
Texas Workers Compensation claimants took a big hit Friday when the Texas Supreme Court handed down a 5-4 decision in Texas Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 4:57 am
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court allowed the reimbursement request stating that, while the date of the medical service preceded insurer’s application for supersedeas reimbursement, the bill for claimant’s surgery did not arrive until six weeks after the denial of supersedeas. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:00 am
L&I is not responsible for the implementation and/or enforcement of the provider’s policy. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:05 am
As expected the Treasury Panel presiding over yesterday's IRC 104(a)(2 hearing) pushed back interlopers Jack Meligan and Dick Risk by informing them them that the hearing WAS NOT the forum to argue IRC 468B single claimant qualified settlement funds. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:05 am
As expected the Treasury Panel presiding over yesterday's IRC 104(a)(2 hearing) pushed back interlopers Jack Meligan and Dick Risk by informing them them that the hearing WAS NOT the forum to argue IRC 468B single claimant qualified settlement funds. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 6:10 am
Ultimately, the Court decided that a remand was appropriate to have Hartford once again review the claim, with updated, in-depth evidence of the claimant's functionality, consideration of the award of Social Security benefits, and discussion with the claimant's treating physicians. [read post]
