Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 1841 - 1860 of 40,585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2010, 11:41 am by The Docket Navigator
Lupin, Ltd. et al., 2-10-cv-00080 (NJD October 27, 2010, Order) (Hochberg, J.). [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 7:24 am by Dan Murphy
The post Does the Severity of the Injury Affect the Charges for Leaving the Scene in Denver? [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:12 pm by A. Brian Albritton
In so ruling, the California 5th District Court of Appeals acknowledged that section 3730(h)(2) provides that "an action under this subsection may be brought in the appropriate district court of the United States" and that section 31 U.S.C. 3732(a) provides further that "Any action under section 3730 may be bought in any judicial district . . . " Yet, the Court noted, that the FCA does not "contain an explicit statutory directive ousting state court jurisdiction" and the "FCA's… [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 3:01 pm by Blonde Justice
 2)  Tell me about your happy hours? [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:26 pm
In a 2-1 decision authored by Judge Stevenson, the court affirmed the convictions of the defendant on several gang related crimes. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 6:34 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It does not look like the courts have ruled on whether a second inventory search is legal, but the Second Circuit breaks ground in this case on that issue.The Court of Appeals does not really get into this, but my sense is they worried that someone else would rent the same car the next day and somehow find the gun in the console. [read post]
24 Nov 2006, 4:44 pm
It does come, after all, in the middle of a paragraph defending HRW as nonetheless the most scrupulous of the human rights monitors. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:22 am by Toni Guarino
 Specifically, the Complaint alleges, “the Company failed to disclose and misrepresented the following material adverse facts which were known to defendants or recklessly disregarded by them: (1) that they had made “diligent efforts” to comply with labor and employment regulations, when in fact they had not done so; (2) that they failed to disclose to investors, and made false statements regarding facts surrounding the Company’s illegal hiring practices… [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 11:19 am by Eugene Volokh
For example, as defendant points out, none of the Doe plaintiffs claim to be employers who could plausibly face future enforcement actions. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 3:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  How does that affect the statute of limitations for legal malpractice when attorney takes on case, moves to law firm 2 and then leaves the case behind there? [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
When it does happen and the defendant does not answer or complain about the incorrect theory, the trial court may conclude that the error has been waived, assuming the judge even becomes aware of the error.But if the default judgment is based on a sworn account only, there may still be grounds to attack it based on a defect in the pleadings. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 2:53 pm
§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B).HELD:(1) Drug dog's failure to fully alert during sniff-test of defendant's boots does not negate probable cause when other circumstances support such finding. [read post]