Search for: "Doctor v. State"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 8,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2023, 7:48 am
From Doe v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 12:38 pm
Key here is that the doctors could not definitively state that “but for” the heroin that Marcus Burrage sold Joshua Banka, Mr. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 8:00 am
The other case, City of Upland v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 12:47 pm
She stated that under Miller v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Whole Women’s Health v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 1:23 pm
At her trial, the doctor offered an exculpatory tape recorded statement made by a codefendant to the doctor assuring the doctor that there was no fraud taking place in the clinic. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 1:23 pm
At her trial, the doctor offered an exculpatory tape recorded statement made by a codefendant to the doctor assuring the doctor that there was no fraud taking place in the clinic. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 8:06 am
In Lozano v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 10:00 am
In fact, that is exactly what the state of Louisiana has expressly asked the court to do in June Medical Services v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 11:51 am
v=bhvsJBiEj24 ; at 6:33 in the interview); You can’t even find a bartender in states like Pennsylvania because of the trial lawyers. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 7:00 pm
"Although treating and examining physician opinions often deserve more weight than the opinions of doctors who review records...the law is clear . . . that the opinion of a treating physician does not bind the ALJ on the issue of functional capacity,'" the court ruled, quoting its opinion earlier this year in Brown v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 12:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm
In Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 1:33 pm
See Hexum v. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
Such service was not in accordance with the mandates of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, which requires service on in-state defendants by a Sheriff’s Department. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
But driving to another state to talk with a doctor in that state on one’s laptop through telemedicine, after which the doctor mails the woman two pills, exposes her to far less harassment and intimidation by advocates of forced pregnancy and birth than visiting an actual clinic to have the procedure. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 12:17 pm
In Parker v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
In Yuin University v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 10:32 am
Div. v. [read post]
