Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 1841 - 1860 of 9,566
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2011, 10:09 am by Kathleen Michon
Quite frankly, that the bar has been set so low (do you really want to attend a school where only 35% of former students can repay $1 of their student loans?) [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 9:00 am by Doug Cornelius
10:00 – 10:30 Keynote Speaker Carlo V. di Florio, Director, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations 10:30 – 10:50 Networking break 10:50 – 12:00 Panel: The new form ADV 2 part 2 - Most important required elements for the brochure - Addressing the  most challenges aspects i.e. confidential information and fees - Handling updates and brochure supplements - Effective delivery 12:00 – 1:00 Panel: CCO… [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 4:50 am
The study suggests that, on average, trading within Rule 10b5-1 does not solely reflect uninformed diversification. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 10:09 am by Florian Mueller
The technologies used for Alternative 1 (A, B and C) are complements: they are each needed to create the device using Alternative 1. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:55 am by Dennis Crouch
Under 35 U.S.C. 312, the Office has the discretion to reconsider issues that have been addressed in the past, provided the estoppel provisions of 35 U.S.C. 317 do not apply. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 7:51 am by Dennis Crouch
 As with other punitive damage regimes – proof sufficient for an award does not necessitate such an award. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 8:33 am
***On April 1, 2007, "60 Minutes" had a discussion of the Medicare Prescription Drug Bill that one probably won't find in C&E News. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 5:29 am by John S. Moffa
The city argued that this statute does not apply to such a situation, while the plaintiff argued that it does. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 2:35 pm by Nicole Mazzocco
  That statute does not require written objections to a special assessment; an oral objection at a hearing is sufficient. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:01 pm
The specification here does not contain "such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art" to make and use non-osmotic oral dosage forms with ascending release rates. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:14 pm by Jason Rantanen
Under section 289, Congress did nothing to preclude the courts from determining what qualifies—and does not qualify—as an “article of manufacture. [read post]