Search for: "Does 1-88"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 2,128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2009, 10:16 am
I apologize for the formatting of the table, which for some reason does not turn out so nicely here.The Treaty of Lisbon entered into force on 1 December 2009 (“ToL”). [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:18 am
Computerized Thermal Imaging, 96 F.3d 88, 92 (4th Cir. 1996); Sherrock Bros. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:06 pm
Be Involved in Your Health Care 1. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 3:06 pm
It is additionally noted that the present claim 1 - as is frequently the case with "Swiss-type" claims - does not specifically mention any process steps. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:48 am
The first step in the administration of the test is to check both of the suspect’s eyes for (1) equal tracking (that is, can they follow an object together?) [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 4:02 pm
The Board comes to the conclusion that the claim is not novel as the allegedly distinguishing feature does not allow to establish a novel use according to the principles laid out in G 2/88 or G 6/88. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 4:02 pm
The Board comes to the conclusion that the claim is not novel as the allegedly distinguishing feature does not allow to establish a novel use according to the principles laid out in G 2/88 or G 6/88. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:44 am
Id. at 587-88. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:23 am
Migliorini, 88 J. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 10:22 am
Arrigo, 88 N.J. 529, 544 (1982). [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:20 am
" Leon, 84 NY2d at 88. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:52 pm
Code Ann. sec. 4-88-101(1) & (3). [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
§4-88-101(1). [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 5:49 am
The facility has been removed from the watch list but maintains a one-star rating, as does a sister facility, the Gainesville Health Care Center. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 3:44 am
Defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) is also denied inasmuch as defendant's affidavit and the documents attached thereto do not definitively and "conclusively establish[ ] a defense to the asserted action as a matter of law" (Leon, 84 NY2d at 88); the documentary evidence merely raises numerous issues of fact, rather than finally dispose of them (see Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., P.C., 160 AD2d 428, 435 [1st Dept 1990]). [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
Mortality is less than 1 percent. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 9:01 pm
Indeed the news is amazing, for at least three reasons beyond the obvious: the fact Duke has an “in the can” response suggests this issue regularly comes up in fundraising pleas.1.)These remarks represent the first acknowledgement by anyone affiliated with Duke that Brodhead’s September 2007 statement referred to the Group of 88. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 9:16 am
About 88% of applicants are approved into the program. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 5:03 am
PP 88-106); (4) Acellus, (id. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 5:13 pm
He/she would therefore conclude that the value of 1% should in fact read 5%. [read post]
