Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE" Results 1841 - 1860 of 3,672
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2008, 3:32 pm
They stated that it was for parliament to change the law in relation to assisted suicide. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:48 am by Stephen Pitel
  There is some allegation that these cases involve what has become known as “libel tourism”, especially in England and in the United States. [read post]
9 May 2009, 8:45 pm
Amended version of 1297 from the UK Statute Law Database and Original and translation version available at the British Library website 1274 Summa Theologica 1625 Grotius’ De iure belli ac pacis 1690 Locke’s Two Treatises on Civil Government 1748 Montesquieu De l’esprit des lois 1772 Somersett v Stewart found that slavery was illegal in England (though not in the Empire) (1772) 20 State Tr 1; (1772) Lofft 1 1804 Napoleon’s Code civil… [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
Nor did Lord Malcom, who did not consider it “necessary to dwell” on the current state of the law concerning whether such a right existed. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 11:17 am
The Supreme Court's ruling this past summer in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 4:34 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The new petition and appendix were filed in Pedersen v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 11:29 am by Giles Peaker
Under section 210(2), the Secretary of State has made the Homelessness (Suitability of Accommodation) (England) Order 2003 (SI 2003 No. 3326) (‘the 2003 Order’). [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 4:06 pm by Socrates & Cassandra
A., and Bank of New England International, Defendants, 682 F. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 6:56 am
A 1983 Irish Law Reform Commission Report on Restitution of Conjugal Rights, Jactitation of Marriage and Related Rights cites the 1820 English case of Lord Hawke v Corri (1820), 2 Hag. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 4:10 am by David J. DePaolo
New England Compounding Center has recalled all of its products. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 2:16 am by Chukwuma Okoli
The defendant/appellant challenged the jurisdiction of the High Court of Cross Rivers State, and asked for a stay of proceedings on the basis that there was an exclusive choice of court agreement in favour of England. [read post]