Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
Counsel's perspective | Mr Justice Nugee and the Superhose: The potentiality of disclosure | Dutch Court of Appeal injuncts unwilling licensee in first post-Huawei v ZTE FRAND decision | English High Court seizes patent infringement jurisdiction once again | No knowledge in secondary copyright infringement of Eminem's first album | Ariana Grande, thank you, next: copyright infringement on Instagram | DSM Directive is now Directive 2019/790 and Member States will… [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 4:36 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 1:54 am
The case primarily rested on how a skilled person would interpret the sketchy results and conclusions presented in the abstract.An interesting point that arose was whether "the state of the art" was the abstract in Japanese or the English translation of the abstract. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 9:37 pm
I was delighted to have the opportunity to teach in the Penn State Law-Universidad Latina de Panamá Program on the Legal English in the U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 12:54 pm
In Case C-722/17 Reitbauer (decided last Wednesday but still not available in English), the Court confirmed its decision in Feniks, according to which such an action falls under Art 7(1) Brussels Ia if it is based on a contractual right. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:40 am
”[5] By contrast, some states will not require the diligent search as to RPG members residing in the state. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:16 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm
In December 2016, the company’s appeal against that decision was rejected by the Fifth Board of Appeal of the EUIPO (the contested decision), which considered that the pronunciation of the first two words ‘Fack ju’ would be perceived by the relevant public almost indistinguishable from that of the English expression ‘Fuck you’. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:48 pm
The last time an English sovereign appeared in court was Charles I in 1649, with terminal consequences. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 8:50 am
Additional Resources: Boren v. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
She stated, at paras. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 2:57 am
Venezuela & Casa Express Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm
Judgment Warby J considered that Mr Mitchell was domiciled or at least present in England and Wales, and therefore that the English Court had jurisdiction. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
Daubert v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
Daubert v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 3:00 pm
The apple for the day, just to be sure you keep the doctor away, is Apple Inc v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
I was dismayed, for example, to learn that Remembrance of Things Past is now more often translated as In Search of Lost Times, which, to put it mildly, conveys, at least to English speakers, quite different meanings. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 11:47 am
Krishna Murthi v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:56 am
Code, entitled “Assistance to foreign and international tribunals and to litigants before such tribunals,” is, in Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s words in Intel v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:29 pm
The chief justice says that Justice Neil Gorsuch has the opinion in United States v. [read post]
