Search for: "English v. English" Results 1841 - 1860 of 9,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2023, 7:43 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
  The central cause of the problem is identified as the Indonesian Supreme Court decision in Bernhard Josef Rifeel v PT Merck Indonesia,[3] which ousted the jurisdiction of the Indonesian courts based on foreign law. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 8:18 am
  What is the English Court's solution to this conundrum? [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 12:52 am
On this point, Tomlinson J referred to FNCB v Barnet Devanney [1999] Lloyd's Rep IR 459 at 468 and to Talbot Underwriting v Nausch Hogan & Murray [2006] 2 Lloyd's Rep 195 at 218 that established that it was the duty of a broker to obtain, as far as is possible, insurance coverage which clearly meets his client's requirements. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:08 am by INFORRM
The important media privacy case of Von Hannover and Springer v Germany is due to be heard by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights on 13 October 2010. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:25 am
The case of Standard Life Assurance v Oak Dedicated Ltd & Ors [2008] EWHC 222 concerned an action brought by the insured against its underwriters, who had subscribed to a policy which provided the insured with liability cover of £75million in excess of £25million. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 8:32 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Thanks to one of the members in the Linkedin International Arbitration group, this blawgger was able to get hold of the decision of the Court of Appeal of Paris in Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:49 am
Circuit Court of Appeals.The instructions are to consider whether Arizona has complied with civil-rights law by improving both English-learner programs and K-12 education overall. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
If D1 and D2 voluntarily engage in fighting each other, each intending to kill or cause grievous bodily harm to the other and each foreseeing that the other has the reciprocal intention, and D1 mistakenly kills V in the course of the fight, in what circumstances, if any, is D2 guilty of the offence of murdering V? [read post]