Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 7,486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2018, 8:15 pm
In 1996, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in Daniel J. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:21 am
State of California (Gaming Compacts – Good Faith Negotiations)James Raymond Acres v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:59 pm
They fought against the passage of California’s Proposition 12, the country’s strongest farm animal protection law, and then its implementation, all the way to the Supreme Court, which decided against them in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 1:32 am
But the broader concept of unfairness under state competition law might have scope for preventing Apple from doing this. [read post]
31 May 2017, 3:15 am
The case of Peruta v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
Morey v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:20 am
As we’ve previously mentioned, the Supreme Court has set oral argument in Perry v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 11:24 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:57 pm
In Imperial Irrigation District v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 2:20 pm
Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 9:08 am
McGuan v. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 10:47 am
The opinion in Latman states that a surcharge of exemptions cannot be “punitive” in nature, and the Onubah opinion echoes this. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 5:55 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:14 pm
And there is good reason to believe that a California Court might rule the opposite way and protect the plaintiff's right of privacy. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 4:16 am
One Wholesaler, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 10:12 am
James Otero for the Central District of California in Robles v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 10:12 am
James Otero for the Central District of California in Robles v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:07 am
–CDM v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 1:46 pm
See, e.g., Wiggins v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 1:44 pm
As Justice Kruger cogently and concisely) explains:"In California, a long-established set of rules governs stays of injunctive orders — that is, orders to do something or to refrain from doing something. [read post]
