Search for: "HAMILTON v. THE STATE" Results 1841 - 1860 of 2,378
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am by Fiona de Londras
Hamilton [1988] 2 I.L.R.M. 542) to order possession upon the production of required proofs. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 8:19 am by admin
Washington St, Rm 30 Morris, Illinois 60450-0707 Phone: 815/941-3258 Fax: 815/941-3265 Hamilton Bobbi Oxford 100 S. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:12 pm by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
Moritz links to this letter from Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted, breaking the tie on the Hamilton County elections board, in what Ned Foley has called a "major ruling" on the meaning of Bush v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 2:35 pm by Orin Kerr
Supreme Court offered in a majority opinion just a few months ago in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 12:28 pm by Stefanie Levine
On January 20, 2011 the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion in Centillion Data Systems, LLC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 12:28 pm by Stefanie Levine
On January 20, 2011 the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion in Centillion Data Systems, LLC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 12:53 pm by David Kopel
The states did not argue that the revisions to the Medicaid grant program violate the 4-factor test in S.D. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 3:05 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Hamilton Country Board of Elections, concluding 2–1 that the Board’s decision to count some miscast ballots but not others may have violated 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause as applied to ballot counting in Bush v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 1:44 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit weighed in on the Hamilton County election snafu that produced potentially conflicting state and federal court decisions. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:40 pm by SOIssues
Ronald Gingell, Case no. 2010-0047 1st District Court of Appeals (Hamilton County) ISSUE: Pursuant to the Supreme Court of Ohio’s recent decision in State v. [read post]