Search for: "Harris v. Day" Results 1841 - 1860 of 2,683
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2012, 8:31 am by christopher
HarvardLaw74 Backup file made by TweetBackup 2012-08-02 15:24:182012-08-02 14:03:54 HarvardLaw74: RT @KeithDarce: Private financing of digital health tripled in 1st half of 2012 to $499B http://t.co/cGPJP6wI via HealthTechZone #startups [Non Social media driven Healthcare startups have the immediate opportunity to achieve solid revenues in an expanding domestic and international market] http://twitter.com/HarvardLaw74/statuses/2308613732094730262012-08-02 00:22:42 HarvardLaw74: 482 recently… [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
Only 149 shopping days left until Christmas (and exactly zero non-shopping days), but if you’re reading this, you know that the much more pertinent figure is that only 63 days remain until the Supreme Court’s next term begins. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Harris, a New York trial court has ruled that there is no privacy interest in public tweets 180 days old or more. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:05 am by rlargent@cdflaborlaw.com
Largent California employers were provided a helpful ruling from the California Supreme Court late last year when it issued its decision in Harris v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:36 pm by Lyle Denniston
October calendar, day by day: Mon., Oct. 1 10-1491 — Kiobel v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/PgY9Cj (Howard Sklar) Attorney-Client Privilege Claim Backfires on JPMorgan in FERC Case - http://bit.ly/NFNL26 (Alison Frankel) Audio Search Accuracy Part I: From Here to Utopia - http://bit.ly/LiJjdT (Jeff Schlueter) Court Imposes Sanctions for Discovery Violations, Orders Appointment of Special Master to Investigate – http://bit.ly/ODxV9e (K&L Gates) Days Three and Four of a Predictive Coding Narrative: Where I Find that… [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy  -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]