Search for: "Holding v. State"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 63,294
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2007, 9:59 am
State and its companion cases, the Indiana Supreme Court disposed of several cases that all asked the same question: does the United States Supreme Court's 2004 holding in Blakely v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 10:21 pm
Foley (Ohio State University College of Law) has posted The Future of Bush v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 9:29 pm
“The court holds that a party seeking cancellation of a registered mark must not only state an Article III controversy that cancellation can remedy, it must also state a valid independent cause of action that encompasses the controversy,” the court held. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:16 am
US v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:32 pm
Ass'n for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 3:15 am
Department for Education v Molyneux: [2012] EWCA Civ 193; [2012] WLR (D) 50 “Regulations E33(2A) and E33(3) of the Teachers’ Pensions Regulations 1997, as amended, did not impose an obligation on the Secretary of State, when considering an application by a teacher for an early pension due to ill-health, made pursuant to regulation E4(4), to request further information from the teacher where the submitted medical evidence did not disclose the… [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 7:45 am
., P.C. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 7:45 am
., P.C. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 7:45 am
., P.C. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 11:40 am
State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 7:04 am
In Yoo v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 2:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:40 am
Justice Kagan cited Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of the United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 7:23 am
A Missouri district court judge has added to the increasing body of law holding that the U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
Morrison (2000) and United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 7:56 am
State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 11:19 am
WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 10:01 am
" United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 5:30 pm
ShareWednesday’s argument in Wilkins v. [read post]
